Safety Control Scan · One camera · One condition

The same forklift–pedestrian condition keeps happening in the same aisle. You just can't see the pattern yet.

Edgentik uses one camera you already own to find where a defined forklift–pedestrian condition keeps repeating—so your team can focus its investigation and measure the same condition again after action.

Illustrative sample Edgentik output from recorded demonstration footage—not a customer site. Site and action details are illustrative; the comparison is descriptive, not causal.
No worker scoring On-site processing Employer owns the control decision
Reviewed evidence34 episodesacross 96 usable hours
ConcentrationAisle 7finished-goods cross-aisle
Peak window13:00–15:000.75 per usable hour
Comparable recheck0.35 → 0.18/hsame defined method
The completed decision

One camera supports one bounded operating decision.

This sample shows how a Scan turns reviewed camera evidence into a bounded finding, keeps the employer’s control decision attached to it, and preserves a matched measurement after implementation.

01

34 reviewed shared-space episodes. One answer: Aisle 7, 1–3pm.

Twelve of 34 reviewed episodes occurred at the same crossing in the same two-hour window—more than twice the rate of any other period. The result gives the team one place and one operating window for focused investigation and control review.

06–080.25
08–110.29
11–130.31
13–150.75
15–180.25

Operational focus: inspect separation controls at Aisle 7 during the peak period.

02

The illustrative site record selects physical separation as the primary control.

In this illustrative workflow, the employer assesses the hazard and records a fixed pedestrian barrier, supported by schedule separation and refreshed markings.

Fixed barrier at the Aisle 7 crossing Replenishment moved outside 13:00–15:00 Crossing markings refreshed Implementation represented as field-verified

Illustrative decision owner · Site Operations

03

The matched demonstration recheck recorded a lower reviewed observation rate.

The demonstration result moved from 0.35 to 0.18 per usable hour using the same camera, zone, policy, review method and 96-hour observation basis. The comparison is descriptive and does not attribute the difference to the illustrative control.

Baseline0.35/h
Recheck0.18/h
Measurement comparability met

Illustrative next decision: retain the control and run one additional matched-method cycle.

Demonstration measurement, not a customer outcome or causation claim. Full method, denominators and limits are in the report.

EV-FL-01
Same-camera co-presence

Pedestrian and material-handling equipment occupy the defined Aisle 7 crossing during one reviewed episode.

Frame not published
EV-FL-02
Shared-space route interaction

The reviewed moment preserves the route relationship used to confirm the defined condition.

Frame not published
EV-FL-03
Defined-zone evidence

The reviewed record ties the episode to the configured camera, zone and policy boundary.

Frame not published

Source frames are not published on this public page. In a production Scan the full evidence stays in your controlled Scan record and is reviewed with your team.

Evidence behind the finding

Not 34 alerts. One pattern the site can investigate.

Distinct episodes are reviewed once, then grouped by area, time and defined condition. The result gives EHS and Operations a specific place and operating window to inspect.

Camera / zoneCamera 01 · Aisle 7
Observation basis8 days · 96 usable h
Defined conditionShared-space co-presence
Finding statusRecurring pattern confirmed
Another supported condition

Restricted-zone entry uses the same bounded method.

Edgentik supports restricted-zone entry as a separately configured camera policy. This compact example shows how the same method applies beyond forklift–pedestrian proximity.

Entries concentrated at one configured boundary and one operating window.

Condition: entry across the Dock 4 east configured boundary.

Observation basis: 47 reviewed episodes across 128 usable hours.

Concentration: 18 of 47 episodes occurred from 11:00–13:00.

Representative site decision: use a fixed crossing, extend separation at the east boundary and move break-period travel away from the staging window.

Each Scan keeps its own denominator, so conditions are never blended into one inflated score. The two conditions do not share an observation basis, so no matched-basis comparison is presented here.

What your site receives

A completed decision record—not another alert dashboard.

Every Scan preserves the evidence supporting the operating decision while keeping hazard assessment and control selection with the employer.

One business objective · one camera · one condition · one clear next decision Delivered as a customer-facing Safety Control Scan and founder-led findings review.
01

Measured baseline

Reviewed episodes, usable observation time and the agreed measurement basis.

02

Operational finding

Where and when the defined condition concentrated, with representative evidence.

03

Control record

The employer-selected action, owner and available implementation evidence.

04

Recheck and decision

What the same measurement showed afterward and whether to expand, refine or stop.

Start narrow. Expand deliberately.

Each additional Scan earns its place.

Start with one camera and one condition, establish a measured result, then expand. As you add Scans, each keeps its own clean measurement, so you build a site-wide picture you can actually trust instead of one inflated number.

Each Scan retains its own denominator and measurement status. Controls and rechecks remain attached to the underlying finding. The employer determines priority across hazards and operating areas.
Illustrative multi-scan site register showing independent findings, controls and rechecks
Illustrative expansion view · every Scan keeps its own measured result and control status.
How Edgentik keeps the comparison defensible
Usable observation basis

Scheduled and usable hours are disclosed so event counts are not presented without coverage. One distinct camera-derived episode is confirmed by a reviewer; continuous frames from the same episode are counted once.

Employer decision boundary

Edgentik records the decision; the employer assesses the hazard and selects the control. The employer considers potential consequence, existing controls and measured exposure when determining priority.

Matched recheck

The baseline and recheck used the same camera, zone, policy, review method and 96-hour observation basis. Reopen or refine if the reduction is not sustained or operating conditions materially change.

Claim boundary

The Scan does not assess severity or rank this finding against other site hazards. Site activity volume was not independently measured. The result does not by itself establish causation or a change in overall safety risk.

Eight-week founding-site pilot

Put one priority condition under continuous observation.

Start with one existing camera, one defined operating concern and one decision your team needs to make. Before kickoff, Edgentik confirms the camera, measurement standard, success criteria and continuing-deployment options.